Contact Us
(833) 486-3753

Month: June 2026

Clinical Guideline Development (Part 5): Why Guidelines Fail – The Structural Forces That Undermine Credibility, Stall Timelines, and Compromise Independence

  Many guideline failures are not failures of evidence alone, they are failures of process. Economic constraints, logistical complexity, and political realities exert a profound influence on guideline development, yet these forces are rarely discussed in the methodology literature despite being obvious to anyone who has lived through a guideline development process. The previous posts …

Clinical Guideline Development (Part 4): From Search Strategy to Submission – What a Credible Guideline Methods Section Actually Looks Like

  In 2025, a systematic review assessed the methodological rigour of 76 clinical practice guidelines published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) between 2013 and 2024. These are not obscure documents from minor societies. They are among the most cited, most influential guidelines in medicine, …

Clinical Guideline Development (Part 3): Delphi, Nominal Group, or RAND/UCLA? Choosing the Right Consensus Method for Your Guideline

  In 1951, the United States Air Force had a question that could not be answered by experiment: how many atomic bombs would be required to significantly disrupt U.S. industrial capacity under nuclear attack? There were no historical precedents to draw on, no experiments to run, no datasets to analyse. All the Air Force had …